İletişimISSN:e-ISSN: 2822-4167
Yazar GirişiHakem GirişiYeni Üyelik
TürkçeEnglish
AnasayfaAmaç ve KapsamYazarlar için RehberMakale GönderSon SayıArşivİletişim

Farklı Sıklıklarda Yetiştirilen Mısır Bitkisinde Tane Verimine Etki Eden Bazı Faktörlerin Değişimlerinin Belirlenmesi

Erdal Gönülal,Çetin PALTA

  • Erdal Gönülal: Bahri Dağdaş Uluslararası Araştırma Enstitüsü
  • Çetin PALTA: Necmettin Erbakan UNİVERSİTESİ EREĞLİ ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ
  •  Yıl : 2024
  •  Cilt : 4
  •  Sayı : 1
  •  Sayfa : 19-33
Bu çalışmada bazı mısır çeşitlerinde farklı bitki sıklıklarının verim ve bazı tarımsal özelliklere etkileri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Deneme, Konya/Karapınar şartlarında 2015/2016 yıllarında yürütülmüştür. Deneme tesadüf bloklarında bölünmüş parseller deneme desenine göre 3 tekrarlamalı olarak kurulmuştur. Çalışmada bölgede yaygın olarak yetiştirilen 3 çeşit (Pionner 0537, DKC 5783, KWS 6565) ana uygulama olarak kullanılmıştır. Alt uygulamalar olarak sabit sıra aralığı (70 cm) ve 7 farklı sıra arası (12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 cm) ve çapraz çift sıra (50x24) kullanılmıştır. Çalışma 3 çeşit x 7 sıra arası x 3 tekrar olmak üzere toplam 63 parselden oluşmuştur. Çalışmada farklı bitki sıklıklarının tane verimi ve bazı tarımsal özellikleri etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Bitki sıklığı arttıkça tane veriminin arttığı fakat sap çapının azaldığı görülmüştür. Özellikle çift sıra çapraz ekimde verimin yüksek olmasına rağmen sap çapı değerinin çok düşük olduğu görülmüştür. Hem verim hem de sap kalınlığı dikkate alınarak 14 ve 16 cm sıra aralıklarının daha uygun olduğu görülmüştür. Aynı zamanda bitki sıklıklarının çeşitlere göre de verimin etkilediği görülmüş olup, dik yapraklı çeşitlerin sık ekime daha uygun olduğu görülmüştür.
Atıf yapmak için : Gönülal, E. & Palta, Ç. (2024). Determination of changes in some factors affecting grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.) crops grown at different densities. Eregli Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.54498/ETBD.2024.30

Çıkar İlişkisi : Yazarlar çıkar çatışması olmadığını beyan etmiştir.

Bu makale CC BY-NC 4.0 lisansı ile yayımlanmıştır.
Ereğli Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
2024, Cilt4, Sayı1
E-ISSN: 2822-4167
Geliş Tarihi : , Kabul Tarihi : , Yayın Tarihi :

Kaynakça

  1. Armağan, M., & Işık, M.İ. (2022). The drought tolerant halophyte plants that can be used for pasture improvement in Karapınar (Konya). Eregli Journal of Agricultural Science, 2 (2), 67-74.
  2. Aydın, H. (1991). Under the conditions of Çukurova II. effect of different nitrogen doses and spacing between rows on yield and yield components in crop maize (Zea mays L.). Ç.Ü. Graduate School of Science, Department of Field Crops, Master Thesis. Adana, Turkey.
  3. Bahadur, M.M., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Chowdhury, M.F., & Shahıdullah, S.M. (1999). Growth and yield component responses of maize as affected by population density. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(4), 1092– 1095
  4. Belfield, S., & Brown, C. (2008). Field crop manual: Maize; A guide to upland production in Cambodia, New south Wales department of primary industries. ISBN 9780734718822.
  5. Caldwell, D.S., Spurgeon, W.E., & Manges, H.L. (1994). Irrigation frequency for underground drip irrigation corn. Trans. ASAE, 37 ( 1994 ) , s. 1099 – 1103.
  6. Çakır, R. (2004). Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Elsevier, Field Crops Research 89, 1–16.
  7. Çelik, H., Katkat, A.V., Aşık, B.B., & Turan, M.A. (2008). Effects of soil applied humic substances to dry weight and mineral nutrients uptake of maize under calcareous soil conditions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 54, 605–614.
  8. Çokkızgın, A. (2002). Determination of different nitrogen doses and row distances in Kahramanmaras conditions. The effect on yield, yield components and physiological properties in corn (Zea mays L.). K.S.Ü. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Master Thesis, K.Maraş,Turkey.
  9. Daynard, T.B., & Muldoon, J.F (1983). Plant-to-plant variability of maize plant growth at different densities. Can. J. Sci., 63,45-59.
  10. Dostalek, R., & Hrusk, L. (1985). Effect of crop density on the production in maize seed. Rastlinna Vyroba 31(10), 1103-1110.
  11. El-Hattab, H.S., Husseın, M.A., El-Hattab, A.H., Abdel Raouf, M.S., & El-Nomany, A.A. (1980). Growth analysis of maize plant in relation to grain yield as affected by nitrogen levels. Z. Acker-und Pflanzenbau (J.Agronomy & Crop Science), 149, 46-57.
  12. Emeklier, H.Y., & Kün, E. (1988). Second crop corn and silage corn growing opportunities in wet conditions in Central Anatolia and determination of feed values. Nature Agriculture and Forestry Magazine, 12( 2), 178-179.
  13. Erdurmuş, D., & Soylu, S. (2023). Afyonkarahisar koşullarında silajlık mısır çeşitlerinin yeşil ot ve kuru madde verimlerinin belirlenmesi. Ereğli Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2),43-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.54498/ETBD.2023.21.
  14. Gönülal, E., & Soylu, S. (2020). Effects of water stress applications in different phenological periods on grain yield, irrigation water usage efficiency and cost in corn plant (Zea Mays L.). Bahri Dağdaş Plant Research Journal. 9 (1), 11-20.
  15. Gönülal, E., & Soylu, S. (2019). Effects of water restrictions in different phenological periods on some agricultural characteristics of corn (Zea mays L.), Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences. 6(4), 753–758.
  16. Gözübenli, H. (1997). In different nitrogen applications ıı. determination of nitrogen usage efficiency of some corn genotypes grown as a crop. Ç.Ü. Institute of Science, PhD Thesis. 217 s. Adana.
  17. Gözübenli, H. (1997). In different nitrogen applications, II. Determination of nitrogen utilization efficiency of some corn genotypes grown as crops. Ç.Ü. Graduate School of Science, PhD Thesis. Adana, Turkey.
  18. Howell, T.A., Tolk, J.A., & Schneider, A.D.(1986). Evapotranspiration, yield, and water use efficiency of corn hybrids differing in maturity. Agron. J. 90,3–9.
  19. Howell, T.A., Cuenca, R.H., & Solomon, K.H. (1990). Crop yield response. "Manegement of Farm Irrigation Systems, Edit. G.J. Hoffman., T.A. Howell., K.H. Solomon." Chap. 5. An ASAE Monograph, s. 93-116, St. Joseph, MI
  20. Hutchınson, R.L., Sharpe, T.R., &Slaghter, R. (1988). Corn plant population and N. Stady. Lousiana Agricultural Experiment Station (1988), 116-117.
  21. Kaplan, M., & Aktas, M. (1993). Comparison of the efficiency of ammonium nitrate and urea fertilizers in hybrid corn and determination of nitrogen fertilizer requirement of this plant. Turk. J. Agric. For., 17, 649-657.
  22. Karadavut, U., Palta, Ç., Kökten, K., & Bakoğlu, A. (2010a). "Comparative study on some non-linear growth models for describing leaf growth of maize", International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 12, 227-230.
  23. Karadavut, U., Genç, A., Tozluca, A., & Palta, Ç. (2010). "Analysis of Dry matter accumulation using some mathematical growth models ın silage and seed corns", Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16, 89-96.
  24. Karadavut, U., & Akıllı, A (2012). Genotype-environment ınteraction and phenotypic stability analysis for yield of corn cultivar. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(3), 220-224.
  25. Kırtok, Y. (1998). Production and use of corn. Kocaoluk Printing and Publishing House, Tarsus. 445p
  26. Lemcoff, J.H., &Lomis, R.S. (1986). Nitrogen influences on yield determinationin maize, Crop Sci., 26,1017-1022.
  27. Nımje, P.M., & Seth, J. (1988). Effect of nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of winter maize. Indian J. of Argon., 33 (2),209-211.
  28. Ogunlela, V.B., Amurowa, G.M., & Ologundeı, O.O. (1988). Growth, yield components and micronutrient nutrition of field-grown maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by nitrogen fertilization and plant density. Fertilizer Research, 17,189-196.
  29. Öktem, A. (1996). II in the conditions of the Harran plain. The effect of different doses of phosphorus on yield and yield components in 10 corn genotypes (Zea mays L.) that can be grown as crops. Ç.Ü. Institute of Science, Field Crops Dep,, PhD Thesis.Adana, Turkey.
  30. Palta, Ç., Karadavut, U., Tezel, M., & Aksoyak, Ş. (2011). Agronomic performance of some corn cultivars (Zea mays L.) in Middle Anatolia. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances,14,1901-1905.
  31. Paradkar, V.K., & Sharma, R.K. (1993). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on maize (zea mays l.) varieties under rainfed condition. Indian Journal Of Agronomy, 38 (2), 303-3-4.
  32. Passioura, J.B., & Angus, J.F. (2010). Improving productivity of crops in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 106, 37-75.
  33. Russel, W.A., &Balko, L.G. (1980). Response of corn inbred lines and single crosses to nitrogen fertilizer. 35th Annual Corn & Sorghum Research Conference, 48-67.
  34. Sağlamtimur, T., Okant, M., Tansı, V., & Baytekin, H. (1989). A study on the effect of plant frequency on yield and some agricultural characters of three corn varieties grown as second crops in the ırrigated conditions of Southeastern Anatolia region. Journal of Ç.U Faculty of Agriculture, 4(2),10-20
  35. Saruhan, V., & Şireli, D. (2005). A research on the effect of different nitrogen doses and plant density on growth, stem and leaf yields in corn (Zea Mays L.). Harran University, Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 9 (2), 45-53.
  36. Sezer, İ., & Yanbeyi, S. (1997). The effect of plant sanitization and nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield, yield components and some vegetable characters in pop corn (Zea mays L. Everta) grown in Çarsamba plain. OMÜ, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Turkey II. Field Crops Congress. 22-25 September, Samsun (s128-133).
  37. Simenov, N., &Tsankova, G. (1990). Effects of fertilizers and plant density on yield of maize hybrids with two ears. Rasteniev’dni Nauki, 27 (8), 14-18.
  38. Suphot, P., & Kitima, M. (1977). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on nitrate reductase, grain yield and some agronomic characteristics in corn (Zea Mays L.). (Agris 1981-1985) Kassetsart Journal, 11 (1-2), 33-49.
  39. Swason, R.A., & Zuber, J. (1996). A case study of a failed organization development ıntervention rooted in the employee survey process. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 9(2): 42–56.
  40. Tüfekçi, A., & Karaaltın, S. (2001). Determination of different nitrogen doses in maize (Zea mays L.) plant grown as the 1st product under Kahramanmaraş conditions. Efficiency and ıts effects on yield components. Turkey 4th Field Crops Congress, 2001, Tekirdağ, 291-295.
  41. TÜİK (2019). Turkish Statistical Institute. Basic statistics, Agricultural production, Area and Production Amount of Cereals and Other Crop Products. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Bitkisel-Urun-Denge-Tablolari-2018-2019-33740
  42. Uslu, Ö.S., & Karaaltın, S. (1999). The effect of different nitrogen doses on physiological properties and yield in corn (Zea Mays L.) Grown as Second Crop under Kahramanmaraş Conditions. 15-20 November 1999, Turkey 3rd Field Crops Congress
  43. Uzunoğlu, S. (1991). Ankara yöresinde hibrit mısırın su tüketimi, KHGM, Toprak ve Gübre araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 172, Rapor Seri No: 64, Ankara.
  44. Ülger, A.C., Genç, İ., & Arıoğlu, H.H. (1986). Effects of different nitrogen doses and 'mixtalol' plant growth regulator on grain yield and some other herbal properties in maize plant. Ç.Ü. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 8, (4), 63-78.
  45. Yerlikaya, Sümbül,.D. & Soylu, S. (2022). Karapınar koşullarında şeker mısır (Zea maysL. saccharata) çeşitlerinin taze koçan ve hasıl verimlerinin belirlenmesi, Ereğli Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 8189.
  46. Yurtsever, N. (1979). Research on fertilizer amounts that can be applied to corn plants under black sea region conditions. Soil Water Technical Journal, Issue:50, 51,52.