ContactISSN:e-ISSN: 2822-4167
Author Sign-inReviewer Sign-inRegister
TürkçeEnglish
HomeAim and ScopeGuide for AuthorsSend ArticleLatest IssueArchiveContact Us

Herbicide Safeners: A Contemporary Review on Chemical, Molecular and Biotechnological Approaches

Esra Karaca

  • Esra Karaca: Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü
  •  Year : 2025
  •  Vol : 5
  •  Issue : 2
  •  Page : 70-83
Herbicide safeners are chemical or biological compounds used to protect crop plants from herbicide-induced non-target injury. The first safeners compounds were developed in the 1970s. Although initially used only in certain cereal species, they are now widely applied to staple crops such as maize, wheat, barley, and rice, as well as oilseed crops such as sunflower, rapeseed, soybean, and cotton. The primary function of safeners is to reduce the toxic effects of herbicides by stimulating plant metabolic detoxification pathways. This article comprehensively reviews the historical development, chemical classification, mechanisms of action, molecular and microbial interactions, and field performance of safeners. Literature findings indicate that safeners play an important role in reducing oxidative stress, particularly by activating the glutathione S-transferase (GST) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme families. Furthermore, safener applications have been shown to regulate the expression of numerous detoxification and stress response genes in plants. When the effectiveness of safener-herbicide combinations was examined under field conditions, a 10–30% increase in yield along with a marked reduction in phytotoxicity. Microbial and biotechnological approaches represent a new era in safener research. Consequently, safeners are not only adjuvants that increase herbicide selectivity but also important tools for understanding plant stress physiology. However, more comprehensive evaluation of environmental safety, residue management, and biological interactions is needed. This article provides a foundation for future research into the ecological, molecular, and biotechnological roles of safeners within sustainable agricultural systems.
Cite this Article As : Karaca, E. (2025). Herbisit Safener’leri: Kimyasal, moleküler ve biyoteknolojik yaklaşımlar üzerine güncel bir değerlendirme. Ereğli Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 70-83.

Conflict of interest : The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article is published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Ereğli Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
2025, Vol5, Issue2
E-ISSN: 2822-4167
Received : , Accepted : , Published Online :

References

  1. Abu-Qare, A., & Duncan, H. (2002). Herbicide safeners: uses, limitations, metabolism, and mechanisms of action. Chemosphere, 48(9), s. 965–974. 10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00185-6
  2. Brazier-Hicks, M., Howell, A., Cohn, J., Hawkes, T., Hall, G., McIndoe, E., & Edwards, R. (2020). Chemically induced herbicide tolerance in rice by the safener metcamifen is associated with a phased stress response. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71(1), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz438
  3. Cummins, I., Bryant, D., & Edwards, R. (2009). Safener responsiveness and multiple herbicide resistance in the weed black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 7(8), s. 807-820. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00445.x
  4. Cummins, I., Dixon, D., Freitag-Pohl, S., Skipsey, M., & Edwards, R. (2013). Multiple roles for plant glutathione transferases in xenobiotic detoxification. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA). General Subjects, 1830(11), s. 3268-3280. DOI: 10.3109/03602532.2011.552910
  5. Davies, J., & Caseley, J. (1999). Herbicide safeners: A review. Pest Science, 55(11), s. 1043-1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199911)55:113.0.CO;2-L
  6. Délye, C., Jasieniuk, M., & Le Corre, V. (2013). Deciphering the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. Trends in Genetics, 29(11), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.06.001
  7. Deng, X. (2022). A Mini Review on Natural Safeners: Chemistry, Uses, Modes of Action, and Limitations. Plants, 11(29), s. 3509. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243509
  8. Deng, X., Zheng, W., Zhan, Q., Deng, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2020). New Lead Discovery of Herbicide Safener for Metolachlor Based on a Scaffold-Hopping Strategy. Molecules, 25(21), s. 4986. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214986
  9. Duhoux, A., Pernin, F., Desserre, D., & Délye, C. (2017). Herbicide safeners decrease sensitivity to herbicides inhibiting acetolactate-synthase and likely activate non-target-site-based resistance pathways in the major grass weed Lolium sp. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8(8), s. 1310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01310
  10. Duke, S. O. (2012). Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years? Pest Management Science, 68(4), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2333
  11. Gaines, T. A., Duke, S. O., Morran, S., Rigon, C. A. G., Tranel, P. J., Küpper, A., & Dayan, F. E. (2020). Mechanisms of evolved herbicide resistance. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 295(30), 10307–10330. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV120.013572
  12. Hatzios, K. (1991). An overview of the mechanisms of action of herbicide safeners. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 46c, s. 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1991-9-1017
  13. Hatzios, K., & Penner., D. (1985). Metabolic basis of herbicide selectivity. Weed Science, 33(3), s. 275–281.
  14. Jablonkai, I. (2013). Herbicide Safeners: Effective Tools to Improve Herbicide Selectivity. Herbicides-Current Research and Case Studies in Use. In: Dr. Andrew P (Ed.). DOI: 10.5772/55168
  15. Komives, T. (1992). Herbicide Safeners: Chemistry, Mode of Action, Applications. Weed Abstracts, 41(12), s. 553.
  16. Kraehmer, H., Laber, B., Rosinger, C., & Schulz, A. (2014). Herbicides as weed control agents: State of the art: I. Weed Control Research and Safener Technology: The Path to Modern Agriculture. Plant Physiology, 166(3), s. 1119-1131. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.241901
  17. Kreuz, K., Tommasini, R., & Martinoia, E. (1996). Old enzymes for a new job: Herbicide detoxification in plants. Plant Physiology, 111(2), s. 349–353. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.2.349
  18. Kuźniak, E., & Gajewska, E. (2024). Lipids and lipid-mediated signaling in plant–pathogen interactions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(13), 7255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137255
  19. Leng, X.-Y., Zhao, L.-X., Gao, S., Ye, F., & Fu, Y. (2023). Review on the discovery of novel natural herbicide safeners. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 71(30), 11320–11331 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c03585
  20. Luo, W., Gu, Q., Chen, W., Zhu, X., Duan, Z., & Yu, X. (2015). Biodegradation of acetochlor by a newly isolated Pseudomonas strain. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 176(2), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-015-1601-7
  21. Nandula, V. K., Riechers, D. E., Ferhatoglu, Y., Barrett, M., Duke, S. O., Dayan, F. E., … Onkokesung, N. (2019). Herbicide metabolism: Crop selectivity, bioactivation, weed resistance, and regulation. Weed Science, 67(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.88
  22. Oerke, E. C. (2006). Crop losses to pests. Journal of Agricultural Science, 144(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005708
  23. Qin, H., Wang, Z., Sha, W., Song, S., Qin, F., & Zhang, W. (2024). Role of Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Plant Machinery for Soil Heavy Metal Detoxification. Microorganisms, 12(4), 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12040700
  24. Pileggi, M., Pileggi, S. A. V., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2020). Herbicide bioremediation: From strains to bacterial communities. Heliyon, 6(12), e05767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05767
  25. Riechers, D., Kreuz, K., & Zhang, Q. (2010). Detoxification without intoxication: Herbicide safeners activate plant defense gene expression. Plant Physiology, 153(1), s. 3-13. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.153601
  26. Rigon, C. A. G., Cutti, L., Angonese, P. S., Sulzbach, E., Markus, C., Gaines, T. A., & Merotto Junior, A. (2021). The safener isoxadifen does not increase herbicide resistance evolution in recurrent selection with fenoxaprop. Plant Science, 313, 111097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.111097
  27. Rosinger, C. (2014). Herbicide safeners: an overview. Julius-Kühn-Archive(443), s. 516-525. DOI: 10.5073/jka.2014.443.066
  28. Simonsen D, Livania V, Cwiertny DM, Samuelson RJ, Sivey JD, Lehmler HJ. (2024) A systematic review of herbicide safener toxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol. Nov;54(10):805-855. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2391431.
  29. Skipsey, M., Knight, K. M., Brazier-Hicks, M., Dixon, D. P., Steel, P. G., & Edwards, R. (2011). Xenobiotic responsiveness of Arabidopsis thaliana to a chemical series derived from a herbicide safener. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286(37), 32268–32276. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.252726
  30. Sun, L., et al. (2023). Transcriptomic analysis of maize uncovers putative genes involved in metabolic detoxification under the treatment of four herbicide safeners. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 190, 105319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2023.105465
  31. Sun, L., et al. (2024). Efficacy and mechanism of cyprosulfamide in alleviating the phytotoxicity of clomazone residue on maize seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1512055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1512055
  32. Taylor, V. L., Cummins, I., Brazier-Hicks, M., & Edwards, R. (2013). Protective responses induced by herbicide safeners in wheat. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 88, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.030
  33. Tian, Y., Zhong, F., Shang, N., Mao, D., Yu, H., & Huang, X. (2024). Maize root exudates promote Bacillus sp. Za detoxification of diphenyl ether herbicides by enhancing colonization and biofilm formation. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-02-24-0020-R
  34. Yuan, J. S., Tranel, P. J., & Stewart, C. N. (2017). Non-target-site herbicide resistance: A family business. Trends in Plant Science, 12(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.11.001
  35. Zhao, Y., Ye, F., & Fu, Y. (2023). Research Progress on the Action Mechanism of Herbicide Safeners. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 71(8), s. 3639-3650. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08815