ContactISSN:e-ISSN: 2822-4167
Author Sign-inReviewer Sign-inRegister
TürkçeEnglish
HomeAim and ScopeGuide for AuthorsSend ArticleLatest IssueArchiveContact Us

Evaluation of Yield and Quality Characteristics of Different Soybean Genotypes Under Konya Conditions

Ramazan KELEŞ,HASAN KOÇ,Berat DEMİR

  • Ramazan KELEŞ: Bahri Dağdaş Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü -
  • HASAN KOÇ: Bahri Dağdaş Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü -
  • Berat DEMİR: Bahri Dağdaş Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü -
  •  Year : 2025
  •  Vol : 5
  •  Issue : 2
  •  Page : 84-95
This study, conducted in 2017 and 2018, aimed to determine the yield, quality, and several morphological characteristics of different soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes. The experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications, using seven lines (HAT I–VII) and six registered cultivars (Arısoy, Ataem-7, Çetinbey, Nova, SA-88, and Umut 2002). Sowing was carried out in six rows with 45 cm row spacing, and identical agronomic practices were applied to all genotypes. Key agronomic and technological traits—seed yield, protein and oil contents, plant height, first pod height, thousand-seed weight, number of pods per plant, and flowering duration—were evaluated. Significant differences among genotypes (p<0.01) were identified for most traits. Seed yield ranged from 292.2 to 397.3 kg da⁻¹, with HAT I showing the highest yield. Protein content varied between 36.4% and 40.4%, with Umut 2002 and HAT VII exhibiting the highest values. Oil content ranged from 19.2% to 22.0%, and the highest value was recorded in HAT II. Plant height varied between 99.9 and 118.1 cm, first pod height between 5.7 and 8.2 cm, thousand-seed weight between 115.8 and 157.5 g, number of pods per plant between 24.2 and 32.5, and flowering duration between 70.3 and 74.3 days. Overall, the results indicated that genotype performance varied depending on climatic and soil conditions. HAT I, HAT II, and Ataem-7 were prominent due to their high yield potential, balanced oil–protein ratio, and morphological stability. In the context of increasing climate change and water limitation, selecting early
Cite this Article As : Keleş, R., Koç, H., & Demir, B. (2025). Konya koşullarında farklı soya genotiplerinin verim ve kalite özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Ereğli Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 84-95.

Conflict of interest : The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article is published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Ereğli Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
2025, Vol5, Issue2
E-ISSN: 2822-4167
Received : , Accepted : , Published Online :

References

  1. Boydak, E., & İşler, N. (1995). Şanlıurfa koşullarında ikinci ürün olarak bazı soya çeşitlerinin dört farklı sıra arasında önemli tarımsal karakterlerinin ve veriminin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(3), 65–80.
  2. Carpenter, A. C., & Board, J. E. (1997). Growth dynamic factors controlling soybean yield stability across plant populations. Crop Science, 37(5), 1520–1526.
  3. Çalışkan, S., & Arıoğlu, H. H. (2004). Amik Ovası koşullarında ikinci ürün olarak yetiştirilebilecek soya çeşit ve hatlarının belirlenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1–2), 23–32.
  4. Ghodrati, G. (2013). Study of genetic variation and broad sense heritability for some qualitative and quantitative traits in soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes. Current Opinion in Agriculture, 2(1), 31–35.
  5. Hatfield, J. L., & Prueger, J. H. (2015). Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes, 10, 4–10.
  6. He, J., Du, Y. L., Wang, T., Turner, N. C., Yang, R. P., Jin, Y., & Li, F. M. (2017). Conserved water use improves the yield performance of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) under drought. Agricultural Water Management, 179, 236–245.
  7. Hu, M., & Wiatrak, P. (2012). Effect of planting date on soybean growth, yield, and grain quality. Agronomy Journal, 104(3), 785–790.
  8. Kalenska, S. M., Ermakova, L. M., Palamarchuk, V. D., Polishchuk, I. S., & Polishchuk, M. I. (2015). System of modern intensive technologies in crop production. Kyiv: Rogalska I. O. (in Ukrainian).
  9. Karagül, E. T., Tunca, Z., Yücel, D., Akçin, A., & Tuğay, M. E. (2011). Ege Bölgesi'nde ana ürün olarak yetiştirilen bazı soya genotiplerinin verimi, verim öğeleri ve nitelikleri üzerinde bir araştırma. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 59–68.
  10. Kovačević, V., Kovačević, D., Pepo, P., & Marković, M. (2013). Climate change in Croatia, Serbia, Hungary and Bosnia and Herzegovina: Comparison of the 2010 and 2012 maize growing seasons. Poljoprivreda, 19(2), 16–22.
  11. Kumagai, E., & Sameshima, R. (2014). Genotypic differences in soybean yield responses to increasing temperature in a cool climate are related to maturity group. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 198, 265–272.
  12. Malek, M. A., Rafii, M. Y., Afroz, M. S. S., Nath, U. K., & Mondal, M. M. A. (2014). Morphological characterization and assessment of genetic variability, character association, and divergence in soybean mutants. The Scientific World Journal, 968796.
  13. Mert, M., & İlker, E. (2016). Ana ürün koşullarında bazı soya (Glycine max L. Merr.) hat ve çeşitlerinin Aksaray bölgesine adaptasyonu üzerine çalışmalar. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(2), 176–181.
  14. Miladinović, J. (1997). Components of phenotypic variation for photoperiod in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) (Master’s thesis). University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Serbia.
  15. Miladinović, J., Hrustić, M., & Vidić, M. (2011). Soybean. Novi Sad, Serbia: Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops and AMB Graphics.
  16. Miransari, M., Adham, S., Miramsari, M., & Miramsari, A. (2022). The physicochemical approaches of altering growth and biochemical properties of medicinal plants in saline soils. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 106(5), 1895–1904.
  17. Prasad, P. V. V., Thomas, J. M. G., & Narayanan, S. (2017). Global warming effect. In B. Thomas, B. G. Murray, & D. J. Murphy (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Science (2nd ed., pp. 289–299). Academic Press.
  18. Ravelombola, F. S. (2022). Breeding soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) under reduced irrigation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas.
  19. Soba, D., Arrese-Igor, C., & Aranjuela, I. (2022). Additive effects of heatwave and water stresses on soybean seed yield are caused by impaired carbon assimilation or pod formation but not flowering. Plant Science, 321, 111320.
  20. Thomas, J. M. G., Boote, K. J., Pan, D., & Allen, L. H. Jr. (2010). Elevated temperature delays onset of reproductive growth and reduces seed growth rate of soybean. Journal of AgroCrop Science, 1, 19–32.
  21. Tucak, M., Popović, S., Čupić, T., Krizmanić, G., Španić, V., Meglič, V., & Radović, J. (2016). Assessment of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) productivity in environmental stress. Poljoprivreda, 22(2), 3–9.
  22. Tuğay, M. E., Tunca, Z., & Akçin, A. (2011). Soya fasulyesi tarımı ve ıslahı. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  23. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2018). Bitkisel üretim istatistikleri. Ankara: TÜİK Yayınları.
  24. Vratarić, M., & Sudarić, A. (2008). Soja (Glycine max L. Merr.). Osijek: Poljoprivredni Institut Osijek.
  25. Yarasır, N., Yiğit, A., & Erekul, O. (2024). Yield and quality responses of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) varieties inoculated with Rhizobia strains under drought stress. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 29(2), 165–176.
  26. Yaver, S., & Paşa, C. (2009, Ekim 19–22). Tekirdağ koşullarındaki bazı soya çeşitlerinin verim kriterleri üzerine bir araştırma. In VIII. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi (Cilt 1, ss. 197–200). Hatay, Türkiye.